2011 State of the Union: assessing the language
After President Obama’s 2009 State of the Union address author Stanley Fish responded this way to Barack Obama’s performance:
?It’s as if the speech, rather than being a sustained performance with a cumulative power, was a framework on which a succession of verbal ornaments was hung, and we were invited not to move forward but to stop and ponder the significances only hinted at.?
Fish is a professor of humanities and law at Florida International University in Miami and author of the book, ?How to Write a Sentence.? He gives us a reaction to the language used in President Obama’s second State of the Union address. Todd Zwillich, the Takeaway’s Washington correspondent, also weighs in on what was missing from the address.
The story you just read is available to read for free because thousands of listeners and readers like you generously support our nonprofit newsroom. Every day, the reporters and producers at The World are hard at work bringing you human-centered news from across the globe. But we can’t do it without you: We need your support to ensure we can continue this work for another year.
When you make a gift of $10 or more a month, we’ll invite you to a virtual behind-the-scenes tour of our newsroom to thank you for being with The World.